The Mystic Technique of Segovia
“It [the electric guitar] is an abomination”
A famous quote once supposedly to have been said by Andrés Segovia. It probably wasn’t clear to Segovia back when he said it, that the Electric Guitar would become a proven musical force. But if we return to his word, abomination, then let me tell you one thing. Segovia is much revered in the world of Classical Guitar, and for one reason: He was a mystic who made playing the guitar seem like an unachieveable height, that would only ever be known by the few. That attitude and practice is the abomination.
Segovia and his transcriptions brought the guitar into more general acceptance as an instrument in its own right, but the positional and finger markings in his music show him to be a mystical time-waster.
I couldn’t even say with accuracy that he definitely played the music like the way he transcribed, but if he did, then he did nothing worthwhile for guitarists and their own struggle to become better players.
The over-complex fingerings, unnecessary slurs and other such markers:- it boils down to one thing: I think Segovia knew that the secret of the guitar was not the complex way one can choose to play it, but the damned simplicity of it -once you’ve built a solid grounding. If you were to try and learn guitar, using Segovia’s transcriptions and his fingerings, then as a beginner a brick wall of complete and utter failure is heading your way.
You can throw away the years trying to emulate the playing style of Segovia, perhaps believing that in doing so you will attain some higher state of playing effortlessly, in a impressively complex manner.
This is a gross, miscalculated assumption. In fact it:
1. Requires many years more work
2. Does not ground any real technique into your playing
3. Has very little reward (no progressive technique)
4. Makes results hard to come by
5. Turns playing the guitar ‘well’ into a whim, on which you’ll have good days and bad ones.
I could go on and on, but the simple fact is that such attitudes are harmful to the enjoyment and satisfaction that many novice players will receive for their efforts.
To counteract such mysticism, and if you have encountered it elsewhere perpetrated by your guitar ‘tutors’ and have struggled with your playing without being able to identify why you are unable to chart your progress, then read on:
Firstly question why you have to play pieces in certain positions and fingering patterns just because they are established by some tradition. Clouding the mind [and the muscles of your body] with nonsensical complexity will waste many hours of practice.
Take your pieces of music, throw away the idiotic patterning, and start over. Learn to play the piece as simply as the notated music allows. Find a suitable position and fingering for the music that does not require any undue complexity and can be played in the simplest manner. This is your key to a solid, grounded technique that will serve you a thousand times more robustly than the mystic’s technique.
The secret of playing classical guitar, which is not commonly told, is that once you have grounded your technique and have learned to play a piece simply, you will naturally begin to look for more personal ways to play the music, choosing different positions, fingerings that suit your level perfectly. Once this starts to happen, the music you play and the manner in which you play it becomes that complex, individual technique you tried to achieve from day one. Do you want to be just another ‘Segovia’ and to struggle to play his way, just because he was a past master? Why – when you can build a foundation of solid technique and develop your own uniqueness?
- Filed under: The Audible, The Iconoclastic, Things In Review, Wisened Counsel
- Permalink
2 Comments
{ Comment on this post }
- Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site.
- Subscribe to these comments.
« Vanguard Television. Oxymoron?
» SitePoint Reference & Opera Panels



Thanks very much for your opinion on the “classic” approach to making music!
I believe that Music should be an emotional thing and there is no feeling in somebody else’s over-complicated technique acquired and refined over years.
Don’t get me wrong, I like watching people who really mastered their instrument. But in many cases these people think of themselves as higher beings, just because they worked so hard.
I learned classical piano as a kid and I always struggled with notation and fingerings and comments like “You always slouch, look at Horowitz, the way he sits at the Piano, take him as an example”. I got the feeling that music is not about music itself, but about the struggle to do it the “right way”. I quit making music when I was a teenager and started again playing the guitar when I was in my twenties. I am a quite decent guitarist now, though I am far from being able to play Segovia (I think I could if I wanted to, but it’s simply not my cup of tea). I played a long time as in-house guitarist at the open-mic night at a bar, accompanying people who wanted to sing but couldn’t play. This was something completely different, in the way of being able to make music in this situation, right now, without preparation, instead of learning something by heart and then “exhibiting” it in front of a sophisticated audience. When I stumbled upon a song there that I couldn’t play (and there were many) it was a motivation for me. I wanted to be able to play this song and I could get myself to practice it for hours, and in the process I discovered lots of stuff that made me grow as a musician. I never had that sort of motivation with the piano.
Yes Andy. I do agree with your take on Andrés Segovia. I love listening to his playing. But it is his playing, his interpretation, nobody else’s. I do not play the guitar, but I know about music and how it is played, how each individual artist weaves into the pieces that were written by another his own meaning, his own philosophy. That is the proper way to present the music, for as a performer of the music you become one with the music. To force yourself to ignore your personal impulses and interpretations of the sense of life presented by the composer would be quite forced. To only imitate what another interpretor of the music has done would not be satisfying, it would be a lie, for you would not be part of it, it would only be a copy.
Ulrike